AN ANALYSIS OF ISAIAH 64:6
How to Refute Christian Missionaries 1
by Samuel Levine



Isaiah 64:6--Here are the quotes: "But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as the leaf and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away. And there is none that calleth upon thy name, that stirreth up himself to take hold of thee;for thou hast hid thy face from us, and hast consumed us,  because of our iniquities. But now, 0 Lord, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter, and we are all the work of thy hand. Be not wroth very sore, 0 Lord, neither remember iniquity for ever; behold, see, we beseech thee, we are all thy people." From this passage, as well as others such as Ecclesiastes (Kohelet)
7:20--"For there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not--the Christians have deduced that man is condemned to sin. Man must sin, and therefore, man needs something with which he can gain eternal salvation. That something, according to the Christians, is blood. Specifically, the blood of Jesus. The reason for this is because Leviticus 17:11 says that in order to achieve atonement, one needs blood. Let us therefore quote that passage as well: "And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that shall eat any man ner of blood, I will set my face against that soul that eats blood, and will cut him off from among his people. For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and l have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul" The Christians have seen from this that one needs blood in order to achieve atonement, and as Hebrews 9 points out, the blood of Jesus is the best blood possible. Thus, the death of Jesus, who supposedly died on the cross to atone for our sins, is the only way to achieve atonement. The argument is made even stronger, however, by the fact that, by looking at Isaiah 64:6 and Leviticus 17:11 together, you see that man is condemned to sin, and that man needs blood to atone for that sin, and now, after the destruction of the Temple, we cannot bring blood as an atonement to the Temple, and we are all therefore condemned to eternal damnation. However, God is merciful, and He would not allow all of mankind to be condemned to eternal damnation. He therefore died on the cross in order to atone for our sins. The missionaries will ask you--how can you achieve forgiveness today, if there is no Temple? Where could you offer blood? This is one of the most fundamental issues of Christianity, and it is therefore very important to understand.

The first question that probably has already crossed your mind is that the timing is off. Jesus died around 32 A.D. and the
Temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. If Jesus died in order to offer us a chance to atone for ourselves, because we need blood, then why did he die during the time when the Temple was still standing? Man did not need Jesus yet, so why did he die then? Did he die in advance?15 Thus, this theory is incorrect, historically.

There are other problems, however, with their argument. Nowhere in the book of Leviticus, or anywhere else, does the Torah allow any form of human blood as an atonement. That was a purely pagan notion performed throughout the world, but never in the Jewish world. The Jews have never offered a human sacrifice with the consent of the Jewish court and community. Furthermore, the entire chapter 17 of Leviticus, and even verse 11, seems to indicate in the strongest terms that all sacrifices and means for atonement that use blood must be offered in the Tabernacle or the
Temple. Since Jesus was not offered in the Temple, nor did any priest sprinkle his blood, he was not an atonement for anyone. In addition, the idea of a god dying in order to atone for the sins of others is purely a pagan idea. See Frazer again, in the beginning of chapter 55, where he mentions that sometimes the accumulated sins of the entire people were placed upon their dying god. Frazer points out that this idea is basic to the pagan mind. In addition, the beginning of the book of Leviticus mentions various animals which could be used as an offering in the Temple, and since it specifies only certain animals, it indicates that only those animals, and no other animals, and certainly no humans, may be used as an offering. See Lev. 1:2, 14. Since Jesus was certainly not an animal, he was disqualified. Lastly, Lev. 17:11 says that the blood must be on the altar, which did not take place in the case of the blood of Jesus.

Let us now deal with the issue of man and sin. Isaiah 64:6 was misunderstood or misinterpreted.  The verse right before it says, among other things, the clause, "we have sinned." It is the beginning of a confession. The next verse then says that we are unclean, and our righteousness is as unclean as filthy rags. The Jews were confessing the reasons for the troubles that were besetting them, and they were saying that even the way that they did acts of righteousness was wrong. The commentaries point out that they felt proud when they did acts of righteousness, or that they did those acts for the sake of prestige and honor. Hence these acts were like dirty rags. The Jews were not saying, however, that whatever any person on earth does is like a dirty rag. That is openly contradicted by Deuteronomy 28, where it says that "if you shall hearken diligently unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe and to do all His commandments which I command thee this day, then the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth... Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shall thou be in the field. Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body... blessed shall be thy basket and thy store. Blessed shall thou be when you come in, and blessed shall you be when you go out..." See the entire passage for the list of all the blessings. Thus, God is saying that when you obey the commandments properly, they will produce blessings of all sorts, not dirty rags. Look at Deuteronomy 30:8-14: "And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the Lord, and do all His commandments which I command thee this day. And the Lord thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good...If thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which are written in this book of the law, and if thou turn unto the Lord thy G-d with all thine heart, and with all thine soul For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, nor is it far off. It is not in heaven, that thou should say,  Who shall go up for us to hea yen, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it? Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou should say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it? But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth,  and in thy heart, that thou may do it." This is clearly saying that the command to hearken unto the word of God is near, it is accessible to the Jews, and all sorts of blessings will result from obeying those laws. This clearly is refuting the Christian claim that one is condemned to sin; it clearly is saying that we can obey the law, if we choose to do so. In fact, the next few verses continue and elaborate that:

"See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil. In that I command thee this day to love the Lord thy God, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, that thou may live and multiply... therefore choose life... " Thus, the Torah is most clearly saying that we have the control to deserve life, that we can be good enough to deserve divine blessing in our bodies, our crops, in all areas of our lives, as well as eternal life. Furthermore, this will result if we will choose to love God and obey His commandments. God said that the law is critical for our well being, unlike Paul, who claimed that it was not, in Galatians 3 and elsewhere.

Thus, man is not condemned to sin, and we therefore do not need Jesus, or God, to die for our sins. That itself is a ridiculous concept. What good would it do for God to kill himself, as a means for my atonement? How will his death make me innocent? How can killing another vindicate my sins? Thus, that verse in Ecclesiastes must be understood to mean that nobody is perfect, in all probability. Man will probably sin, no matter what--but so what? God said that that will not deprive a person from blessing, because, as that verse in Deut. 30:8 said, 'And you shall return "--if you return to God, i.e., even if you were away from God, even if you sinned, just return to Him, and then the Lord will place all types of blessings on you. Repentance is the key point, according to God. Thus, in Psalms 5
1: 17, it says that "The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, 0 God, Thou wilt not despise. "Blood is not essential, Jesus is not essential, because God will always accept a broken, repentant spirit. Now we must come to another point which most people are unaware of. It seems that Psalms 5 1: 17 seems to disagree with Lev. 7:11. The obvious answer is that in Leviticus, God is simply saying that He gave us the option of using blood, not that blood is essential. Thus, neither verse, nor any verse, states that blood is essential.

If you look throughout the Bible, you will see more evidence of that. In Jonah 3: 10, it says that "God saw their works that they turned from their evil way" and so He did not destroy the people of 
Nineveh. It says that God saw their change of behavior, not that He saw their blood offerings. In Hosea 14:2, in the original Hebrew, it reads, "Return 0 Israel, unto the Lord your God, because you have stumbled in your sins. Take with you words, and return to the Lord; say unto Him,  Forgive all of our iniquities and take the good (in us), and let our mouthspay, instead of bullocks."  The verse is clearly saying that a sincere return to God, with a verbal apology, is just as good as the blood of the bullocks. Thus, Ezekiel 33:11 says that God says "that I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live..." The main thing is to repent, turn from one's evil ways, and then one will live, one will receive God's blessings, and one will be forgiven of all sin. That is the message of the Torah, if you read it honestly, and in the original Hebrew.

Thus, the notion that man is condemned to sin is not based on the Torah. The notion that we need blood, and blood alone, in order to receive forgiveness, is not based on the Torah.

Besides, Jesus was not offered on the altar, he was not offered in the Temple, his blood was not sprinkled like all other offerings--in short, he was not a blood offering even if it would be possible to use humans, which, of course, is not permissible.

Thus, the Christians may ask you about Psalms 14:3 and other verses. Realize that they misunderstand those verses, or else the Bible is totally contradictory. Psalm 14:3, for example, says that God sees that no one does any good. This is referring to the fools of the first verse, where it explicitly says that there are no fools that do any good.

 

FOOTNOTE:

1. You Take Jesus, I'll Take G-d, by Samuel Levine, section one, #10

 

 

 

 

RETURN